§ 65.22. Applicable rules.

 (a)  With respect to offers of suitable work made by an employer, the following rules apply:

   (1)  A work offer may be considered as suitable irrespective of whether the work is in employment as defined in sections 4 and 402(a) of the law (43 P. S. § §  753 and 802(a)).

   (2)  The notification shall be made to the local public employment office at which the employe has filed or may file an application for benefits or a registration renewal.

   (3)  The offer to the employe may be in writing in which case a carbon copy or an exact duplicate shall be furnished to the employment office within 7 working days after the mailing of the offer. If the employer’s offer is not made in writing, as, for example, where it is made by telephone, the employer shall provide the employment office with a detailed written description of the offer within 7 working days after the making thereof. Regardless of the manner in which the offer is communicated to the employe, it shall include all of the following:

     (i)   The rate of pay and unit of work or period of time which the rate represents.

     (ii)   The scheduled working hours during each day of the week.

     (iii)   The location of the work.

     (iv)   A description of the duties or a generally recognized term covering the duties.

     (v)   An unusual requirement or condition of work.

 (b)  Where the employer who makes the offer has employed the employe after the beginning of the employe’s base year and, in his offer of employment to the employe, states that the conditions of the job are substantially the same as those under which the employe last worked for the employer, the requirements enumerated in subsection (a) are not required to be included.

 (c)  If the job offered the employe is covered under a labor-management agreement and a statement to this effect is made in the offer of employment, no further description will be required.

 (d)  It will be the responsibility of the Department, before issuing a decision on a claim for benefits, to determine on the basis of facts whether the work offer was suitable within the meaning of section 4(t) of the law (43 P. S. §  753(t)).

   The provisions of this §  65.22 adopted July 1, 1969; amended December 20, 1974, effective December 21, 1974, 4 Pa.B. 2567. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (9311) and (13479).

   Work Offer

   It is error to grant compensation to an applicant merely because an employer did not properly notify the Bureau of the failure of an employe to accept a work assignment. MacDonald v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 333 A.2d 199 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1975).

   After the Board determines that an offer of suitable employment was refused, it is without authority, absent a showing of prejudice, to grant compensation merely because the form of the notice of an offer of work by a claimant’s prior employer was defective. General Motors Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 322 A.2d 762 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1974).