![]()
CHAPTER 17. SPECIAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND
PROCEDURE FOR MATTERS BEFORE THE BOARDSubchap.
A. GENERAL 17.1
B. LICENSE APPLICATIONS 17.11
C. APPEALS TO BOARD FROM ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISIONS 17.21
D. SUPERSEDEAS 17.31
E. DIVESTITURE 17.41Authority The provisions of this Chapter 17 amended under section 207(i) of the Liquor Code (47 P. S. § 2-207(i)), unless otherwise noted.
Subchapter A. GENERAL
Sec.
17.1. Purpose.
17.2. Liberal construction.
17.3. Definitions.
17.4. Legal representation.
17.5. Subpoenas.
17.6. Depositions and discovery.
17.7. Exhibits.
17.8. Continuances.
17.9. Briefs.§ 17.1. Purpose.
This chapter supplements 1 Pa. Code Part II (relating to General Rules of Administrative Practice and Procedure) and governs the practice and procedure before the Board regarding license applications, appeals from ALJ decisions, applications for supersedeas, divestiture and noise exemption petitions.
Source The provisions of this § 17.1 adopted May 6, 1983, effective May 7, 1983, 13 Pa.B. 1580; amended December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935; amended January 5, 2007, effective January 6, 2007, 37 Pa.B. 16. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (229089).
§ 17.2. Liberal construction.
(a) This chapter shall be liberally construed to assure just, speedy and inexpensive determination of issues presented.
(b) This section supplements 1 Pa. Code § 31.2 (relating to liberal construction).
Source The provisions of this § 17.6 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
§ 17.7. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits to be presented in connection with a hearing shall be submitted in five copies each at the time of the hearing unless otherwise directed by the Board.
(b) Subsection (a) supersedes 1 Pa. Code § 33.15 (relating to number of copies).
Source The provisions of this § 17.8 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
§ 17.9. Briefs.
(a) At the close of each hearing, a schedule for the submission of briefs will be determined. Briefs to be presented in connection with a hearing shall be submitted in four copies.
(b) The provisions of 1 Pa. Code § 35.193 (relating to filing and service of briefs) are supplemented as to acceptance and filing of briefs and superseded as to the number of copies to be filed. To the extent it relates to the time within which the Board must act on an appeal or application for supersedeas, 1 Pa. Code § 35.190(c) (relating to appeals to agency head from rulings of presiding officers) is superseded.
Source The provisions of this § 17.9 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
Subchapter B. LICENSE APPLICATIONS
Sec.
17.11. License application protests.
17.12. Intervention in license application matters.
17.13. Protests/intervention procedure.
17.15. Intervention in noise exemption petitions.§ 17.11. License application protests.
(a) When location is at issue. When an application has been filed for a new retail liquor license, retail malt or brewed beverage license, importing distributor or distributor license, or the transfer of these licenses to a premises not then licensed, or for the extension of premises of these licenses, a protest may be filed with the Board by the following:
(1) A licensee whose licensed premises is located within 200 feet of the premises proposed to be licensed.
(2) A church, hospital, charitable institution, school or public playground located within 300 feet of the premises proposed to be licensed.
(3) A resident of the neighborhood within a radius of 500 feet of the premises proposed to be licensed.
(b) When qualifications of an applicant are at issue. A protest may be filed with the Board by a person having information regarding the qualifications of an applicant for a new retail liquor license, retail malt or brewed beverage license, importing distributor or distributor license, or for the transfer of these licenses to another person or when a corporation or club, as required by Chapter 5 Subchapter G (relating to change of officers of corporations and clubs) submits a change of officers, directors or stockholders.
(c) Effect of protest. A protest filed in compliance with this chapter is deemed a valid protest and is public information. Protestants may be called as witnesses to testify as to the fact and nature of the protest, if a hearing is convened.
(d) Notice to Board. A valid protest is intended to alert the Board of the fact and nature of protest. A protest will not be considered as establishing the truth of the assertions therein, but the Board may consider valid protests in determining what action is appropriate.
(e) Need to intervene. Only valid protests brought under subsection (a), relating to when location is at issue, render the protestant a party to the proceeding. A separate petition to intervene is not required for this purpose. Other protestants, including those objecting to the qualifications of an appellant, shall file a petition to intervene under § § 17.12 and 17.13 (relating to intervention in license application matters; and protests/intervention procedures), in order to become a party.
(f) Public file. A valid protest shall be placed into a public file associated with, but not part of, the record upon which the decision of the Board is made.
Source The provisions of this § 17.11 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
Notes of Decisions Parties
It was clear to the Liquor Control Board that this was an application for a person-to-person transfer and not an application for a new retail liquor license or the transfer of a retail liquor license to a premises not then licensed. This being so, the protestants under Board rules, which it ignored, were required to petition to intervene consistent with the requisites set forth in § 17.13. The record is devoid of any petitions to intervene being filed by these protestors; thus, the participation of the protestants in the hearing before the hearing examiner of the Board was not consistent with established published procedures of the Board and they should not have been permitted to participate as parties. Arrington v. Liquor Control Board, 667 A.2d 439 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995).
§ 17.12. Intervention in license application matters.
(a) A person who can demonstrate a direct interest in an application for a new retail liquor license, retail malt or brewed beverage license, importing distributor or distributor license, or the transfer of these licenses, whether person-to-person, place-to-place, or both, or an extension of premises of these licenses, and who can further demonstrate that a Board decision contrary to the persons direct interest will cause the person to be aggrieved may file a petition to intervene.
(b) The petition to intervene may be granted at the discretion of the Board. The Board may grant or deny the petition in whole or in part or may authorize limited participation. In rendering its decision, the Board will consider whether the petitioner has a direct interest in the proceeding and will be aggrieved by a Board decision contrary to that direct interest.
Source The provisions of this § 17.12 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
Notes of Decisions Intervenor
Trade association of beer distributors had standing to petition to intervene in licensing proceedings in which the Liquor Control Board granted application for a double transfer of an eating place malt beverage license to premises on which a restaurant, convenience store, and gas station would operate since the association showed sufficient harm from the license application and its members are within the group regulated and protected by the applicable statutory scheme. MBDA v. Liquor Control Bd., 881 A.2d 37, 42 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005).
A person not a party to a license transfer proceeding under the Liquor Code may petition to intervene, and will be permitted to do so upon a showing that the petitioner may be aggrieved by the outcome of the hearing. To demonstrate that she is aggrieved, the petitioner must have a direct and substantial interest in the adjudication, and must show a sufficiently close causal relation between the decision and the asserted injury. Where the petitioner provided evidence of negative impact from the past and present operation of the licensed establishment, and the petitioner resides within 500 feet of the premises, the petition to intervene should be granted. Burns v. Rebels, Inc., 779 A.2d 1245 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001).
Cross References The provisions of this § 17.13 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
Notes of Decisions Form
A party, who failed to raise an issue in its original protest, waived the issue and could not thereafter raise the issue in a supplemental protest well after the 30-day deadline for filing protests. Pittsburgh Stake of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. Liquor Control Board, 617 A.2d 843 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1992).
Petition to Intervene
It was clear to the Liquor Control Board that this was an application for a person-to-person transfer and not an application for a new retail liquor license or the transfer of a retail liquor license to a premises not then licensed. This being so, the protestants under Board rules, which it ignored, were required to petition to intervene consistent with the requisites set forth in § 17.13. The record is devoid of any petitions to intervene being filed by these protestors; thus, the participation of the protestants in the hearing before the hearing examiner of the Board was not consistent with established published procedures of the Board and they should not have been permitted to participate as parties. Arrington v. Liquor Control Board, 667 A.2d 439 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995).
Cross References The provisions of this § 17.15 adopted January 5, 2007, effective January 6, 2007, 37 Pa.B. 16.
Subchapter C. APPEALS TO BOARD FROM ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW JUDGE DECISIONS
Sec.
17.21. Appeals.§ 17.21. Appeals.
(a) Under section 471 of the Liquor Code (47 P. S. § 4-471), the Bureau or licensee who feels aggrieved by a decision of the ALJ has the right of appeal to the Board.
(b) An appeal to the Board shall be in the form prescribed by the Board, and is subject to the following conditions:
(1) The appeal shall be accompanied by a $35 fee payable to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board.
(2) Appeals shall be filed or postmarked within 30 calendar days of the mailing date of the opinion and adjudication of the ALJ; failure to file or have the appeal postmarked within 30 calendar days will result in dismissal of the appeal.
(3) A copy of the opinion and adjudication of the ALJ shall be attached to the appeal.
(4) The appeal shall include a concise enumeration and explanation, in the numbered paragraphs, as to each finding of fact which the appellant believes is not supported by substantial evidence.
(5) The appellee shall have 15 days from the mailing date of the Boards notice that an appeal has been filed to respond in writing to the matters raised on appeal; however, no response is required.
(c) The filing of a motion for reconsideration under the rules of the ALJ will stay the processing of an appeal filed with the Board. The filing of a notice for reconsideration will not toll the 30-day time period for the filing of an appeal with the Board.
(d) An appeal shall be reviewed solely upon the record made before the ALJ.
(e) The filing of briefs is optional. A brief shall be filed with the appeal, or response to an appeal, and served on the opposing party, to be considered by the Board. Reply briefs shall be filed within 10 days of the filing date of the brief as to which the reply is made.
Source The provisions of this § 17.21 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
Subchapter D. SUPERSEDEAS
Sec.
17.31. Supersedeas.
17.32. Hearings.§ 17.31. Supersedeas.
(a) An appeal from a decision of an ALJ does not act as an automatic supersedeas if the licensee has been found to have committed one or more of the special violations of section 471 of the Liquor Code (47 P. S. § 4-471), unless the Board, upon sufficient cause shown, determines otherwise.
(b) A completed application for supersedeas in decisions involving special violations shall be filed concurrent with the appeal but the Board will not consider an application for supersedeas filed more than 30 days after the mailing date of the opinion and adjudication of the ALJ, unless good cause is shown. The application for supersedeas shall be in the form prescribed by the Board and shall list each reason which would demonstrate to the Board that sufficient cause exists for the Board to grant the supersedeas.
(c) When a licensee files a timely appeal from a decision of the ALJ wherein the licensee is found to have committed one or more standard violations, penalties imposed only for standard violations shall be subject to an automatic supersedeas pending the Boards determination of the appeal unless, upon sufficient cause shown, the Board determines otherwise.
(d) The Bureau may apply to the Board to remove a supersedeas. The Bureau shall set forth in numbered paragraphs reasons which demonstrate that sufficient cause exists to remove the supersedeas. An immediate hearing may be scheduled.
(e) Within 10 days of the mailing date of the Boards notice that an application, whether for supersedeas or its removal, has been filed, a response may be filed by the Bureau.
Source The provisions of this § 17.31 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
§ 17.32. Hearings.
(a) The Board may schedule a hearing for the purpose of receiving relevant evidence on the issue of the grant or the removal of a supersedeas. The hearing may be scheduled and held within 10 days of the mailing date of the notice. Continuances will be granted solely at the discretion of the Board.
Source The provisions of this § 17.32 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
Subchapter E. DIVESTITURE
Sec.
17.41. Divestiture.§ 17.41. Divestiture.
(a) When the Board determines that a person is not eligible or qualified under the law to have an ownership interest in a licensed business, the Board may issue an order of divestiture to the licensee directing the removal of the person. Failure to comply with the Boards order may result in a citation by the Bureau.
(b) A person aggrieved by the Boards action of divestiture may request a hearing before the Board within 20 days from the date of the Boards order.
(1) The Board will, upon receipt of the request, fix a time and place for hearing before the Board.
(2) The request for hearing shall act as an automatic supersedeas of the Boards order.
Source The provisions of this § 17.41 adopted December 27, 1991, effective December 28, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 5935.
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.