![]()
CHAPTER 445. OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DEVICES Sec.
445.1. Purpose.
445.2. Definitions.
445.3. Directional and official signs.
445.4. Signs in zoned or unzoned commercial or industrial areas.
445.5. On-premise signs.
445.6. Permits.
445.7. Restoration of damaged or partially destroyed nonconforming signs.
445.8. Abandoned signs.
445.9. Erection, maintenance and repair of signs.Authority The provisions of this Chapter 445 issued under section 6 of the Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971 (36 P. S. § 2718.101), unless otherwise noted.
Source The provisions of this Chapter 445 adopted May 12, 1972, effective May 13, 1972, 2 Pa.B. 845, unless otherwise noted.
Notes of Decisions An assertion that a sign owner was improperly subjected to selective administrative enforcement of the Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971 (36 P. S. § § 2718.1012718.115) and its corresponding regulations found at this chapter may not be raised before the court if not raised and developed at a hearing before the Department which petitioners failed to attend and communicated to the Department their intention to abandon the matter. Fritz v. Department of Transportation, 468 A.2d 538 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1983).
§ 445.1. Purpose.
This chapter is promulgated for the purpose of establishing standards, including criteria for size, spacing and lighting, of outdoor advertising devices consistent with the act, and 23 U.S.C.A. (relating to highways) and the Federal regulations promulgated thereunder; and to establish a system for the issuing of permits for the outdoor advertising devices, as required by the act.
Source The provisions of this § 445.1 adopted May 12, 1972, effective May 13, 1972, 2 Pa.B. 845; renumbered September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534.
Notes of Decisions Highway Ramps
The provisions of this § 445.2 adopted May 12, 1972, effective May 13, 1972, 2 Pa.B. 845; amended May 21, 1976, effective May 22, 1976, 6 Pa.B. 1135; renumbered September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534; amended January 19, 1979, effective January 20, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 267.
Notes of Decisions Construction
The Department of Transportations interpretation of what constitutes an on-premises sign is clearly erroneous, as it is inconsistent with the express provisions of the definition of premises. A regulation must be construed, if possible, to give effect to all of its provisions, and every word is to be given meaning and not treated as surplusage. Highway News, Inc. v. Department of Transportation, 789 A.2d 802 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002).
Nonconforming
In determining whether less than 50% of the storm damaged nonconforming sign remained intact, thus precluding the sign owner from repairing or rebuilding the sign located in the residentially zoned area, the Department improperly expanded the meaning of intact to include the concept of upright and in place. Martin Media v. Department of Transportation, 641 A.2d 630 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1994).
Presumption of Validity
The provisions of this § 445.3 adopted May 12, 1972, effective May 13, 1972, 2 Pa.B. 845; amended May 21, 1976, effective May 22, 1976, 6 Pa.B. 1135; renumbered September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534.
Cross References The provisions of this § 445.4 adopted May 12, 1972, effective May 18, 1972, 2 Pa.B. 845; amended May 21, 1976, effective May 22, 1976, 6 Pa.B. 1135; renumbered September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534.
Notes of Decisions Exceptions
Advertisers double-faced sign advertising off-premises activity within 500 feet of an interchange was not exempted from the prohibition of sign under this section because it was only visible to a motorist on one side of the road. George Washington Motor Lodge Co. v. Department of Transportation, 545 A.2d 493 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1988).
Advertisers sign structure on its property advertising on-premise activity was within the exception of prohibiting the advertisement of off-premise activity within 500 feet of an interchange. George Washington Motor Lodge Co. v. Department of Transportation, 545 A.2d 493 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1988).
The Departments interpretation of the exit or entrance, in this section to mean all entrances or exits from the sign was upheld because the petitioner could not prove the interpretation to be plainly erroneous. George Washington Motor Lodge Co. v. Department of Transportation, 545 A.2d 493 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1988).
Petitioners sign structure on its property advertising on-premise activity was found to be within the exception of prohibiting the advertisement of off-premises activity within 500 feet of an interchange. George Washington Motor Lodge Co. v. Department of Transportation, 545 A.2d 493 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1988).
Petitioners assertion that its double-faced sign advertising off-premises activity within 500 feet of an interchange should be exempted from the prohibition of sign under this section because it was only visible to a motorist on one side of the road was denied as the petitioner failed to prove that the Departments interpretation was plainly erroneous. George Washington Motor Lodge Co. v. Department of Transportation, 545 A.2d 493 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1988).
Pavement Defined
Although the word pavement is not defined in the Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971 or the Pennsylvania Administrative Code, the Department of Transportation properly relied upon pavement to be the paved portion of the roadway and exit, exclusive of the shoulder, as distinguished from the markings painted on the paved portion. Media v. Department of Transportation, 700 A.2d 563 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1997).
Rational Basis
The restriction which limits the use of flashing, intermittent or moving lights to public service information is consistent with the legislative intent to limit advertising along roadways. Corteal v. Department of Transportation, 821 A.2d 173 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003).
Cross References The provisions of this § 445.5 adopted May 12, 1972, effective May 13, 1972, 2 Pa.B. 845; renumbered September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534.
Cross References The provisions of this § 445.6 amended January 19, 1979, effective January 20, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 267; amended May 21, 1976, effective May 22, 1976, 6 Pa.B. 1135; renumbered September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534; amended January 19, 1979, effective January 20, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 267.
Notes of Decisions Application Contents
It is reasonable for the Department of Transportation to ask in the application form if signs will be in a Cotton or Kerr Area. Philadelphia Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transportation, 690 A.2d 789 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1997).
Revocation of Permits
The changing of an exterior sign which was a nonconforming sign from a wooden frame supported by wooden stands to one with a metal frame and catwalk supported by a single steel post is a structural improvement and supported finding that signs had been erected after the effective date of the outdoor advertising control act and justified revocation of the sign permits. Park Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Transportation, 485 A.2d 864 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984).
Timing Sequence
The companys failure to challenge the Department of Transportations time-stamping of the other companys application one minute earlier than its own application, even though representatives of both companies were present at the same time, until after its application for signage along the highway was denied constituted a waiver of its right to challenge the timing sequence which adversely affected its application. Morgan Signs, Inc. v. Department of Transportation, 676 A.2d 1284 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996).
§ 445.7. Restoration of damaged or partially destroyed nonconforming signs.
(a) Application. This section applies to signs erected or controlled under this chapter or the act.
(b) Nonconforming signs. Nonconforming signs shall conform with the following:
(1) If a sign is damaged or destroyed as a result of tortious conduct such as vandalism, the sign may be repaired or replaced by the sign owner.
(2) If a sign is damaged as a result of natural disaster or nontortious conduct so that 50% or more of its value remains intact, the sign may be repaired by the sign owner.
(3) The following apply to signs damaged or destroyed as provided in paragraphs (1) and (2):
(i) Determination of the value of the sign and the damage shall be made by the Department.
(ii) Replaced or repaired signs shall be of equal or lesser dimensions and constructed of the same or less durable material than the sign being replaced or repaired and shall contain no improvements or additions.
(iii) If a sign is replaced the replacement sign shall remain at the same location.
(iv) If a sign is destroyed or damaged as a result of natural disaster or other nontortious conduct so that less than 50% of the sign remains intact, the sign may be repaired or replaced only in compliance with the provisions of this chapter. Determination of the value of the sign and the damage shall be made by the Department.
(v) Damaged or destroyed signs not replaced or repaired within 60 days of notice from the Department shall be considered abandoned.
Source The provisions of this § 445.7 adopted May 12, 1972, effective May 13, 1972, 2 Pa.B. 845; renumbered September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534.
Notes of Decisions Natural Disaster
In determining whether less than 50% of the storm damaged nonconforming sign remained intact, thus precluding the sign owner from repairing or rebuilding the sign located in the residentially zoned area, the Department of Transportation improperly expanded the meaning of intact to include the concept of upright and in place. Martin Media v. Department of Transportation, 641 A.2d 630 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1994).
The hearing officer properly interpreted this section to provide that a nonconforming outdoor sign damaged in excess of 50% of its value may not be replaced unless the replacement sign is in compliance with this chapter, that is, be conforming. Millers Smorgasbord v. Department of Transportation, 590 A.2d 854 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1991).
Nonconforming Use
Sign owners violated the nonconforming use requirement of this section, that repaired signs must be of equal or lesser dimensions, by completely removing an old sign and replacing it with one constructed out of steel, not wood, and by adding halogen lighting. Keystone Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transportation, 687 A.2d 47 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996).
Owners Duty
Where a sign owner failed to provide the Department of Transportation with repair invoices or billings, the Department was unable to make a determination as to replacement cost under subsection (b)(2); therefore, the Departments determination that the sign had been abandoned was justified. Kasha v. Department of Transportation, 782 A.2d 15 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001).
Repairing Signs
By completely removing the old nonconforming sign following storm damage and replacing it with one constructed out of steel, not wood, and by adding halogen lighting, Appellants violated this regulations requirement that repaired signs must be of equal or lesser dimensions, constructed of the same or less durable material than the sign being repaired and contain no improvements or additions. Keystone Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transportation, 687 A.2d 47 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996); appeal denied 698 A.2d 597 (Pa. 1997).
§ 445.8. Abandoned signs.
(a) Application. This section applies to signs erected or controlled under this chapter or the act.
(b) Abandoned sign defined. The following signs shall be presumed to be abandoned:
(1) A sign which has remained without bona fide advertising for 12 months or which has been without a current lease or license from the landowner for more than 90 days.
(2) A sign other than a nonconforming sign which requires maintenance or repair in excess of 25% of the replacement cost of the sign. Determination of the replacement cost of the sign and of the amount of required maintenance or repair shall be made by the Department after consultation with the sign owner.
(3) A sign for which a valid tag permit under § 445.6(b) and (c) (relating to permits) was not issued.
(4) A sign considered abandoned under § 445.7(b) (relating to restoration of damaged or partially destroyed nonconforming signs).
(5) A nonconforming sign, otherwise compensable under section 9 of the act (36 P. S. § 2718.109), which since the date on which the sign became eligible for compensation, has been enlarged, illuminated or structurally improved in any manner (except normal repairs) or the location of which has been changed.
(6) A sign, the permit for which has been revoked under the act or its amendments or this chapter.
(c) Removal of abandoned signs. Signs that are abandoned shall be removed by the persons responsible for the erection or maintenance thereof within 30 days after notice by the Department of the abandonment. Upon 30 days notice the Department may remove signs that are abandoned at the expense of those responsible for the erection or maintenance of the signs.
Source The provisions of this § 445.8 adopted May 21, 1976, effective May 22, 1976, 6 Pa.B. 845; renumbered September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534; amended January 19, 1979, effective January 20, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 267.
Notes of Decisions The changing of an exterior sign which was a nonconforming sign from a wooden frame supported by wooden stands to one with a metal frame and catwalk supported by a single steel post is a structural improvement justifying the Departments determination that the conforming sign has been abandoned according to subsection (b)(5). Park Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Transportation, 485 A.2d 864 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984).
Cross References The provisions of this § 445.9 amended under the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. § § 501508 and 701704.
Source The provisions of this § 445.9 adopted May 21, 1976, effective May 22, 1976, 6 Pa.B. 1135; renumbered and amended September 8, 1978, effective September 9, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 2534; amended November 10, 1978, effective November 11, 1978, 8 Pa.B. 3095; amended July 27, 2001, effective July 28, 2001, 31 Pa.B. 4089. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (250453).
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.