Rule 105. Limited Admissibility.

 When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the court upon request shall, or on its own initiative may, restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.

   This rule differs from F.R.E. 105 in that the language ‘‘or on its own initiative may’’ has been added. This rule is consistent with Pennsylvania law. In addition to the approach taken by Pa.R.E. 105, there are other ways to deal with evidence that is admissible as to one party or for one purpose, but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose. For example, the evidence may be redacted. See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 474 Pa. 410, 378 A.2d 859 (1977). Or, a severance may be an appropriate remedy. See Commonwealth v. Young, 263 Pa. Super. 333, 397 A.2d 1234 (1979). Where the danger of unfair prejudice outweighs probative value, the evidence may be excluded. See Pa.R.E. 403; McShain v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America, 338 Pa. 113, 12 A.2d 59 (1940).

   Official Note

   Adopted May 8, 1998, effective October 1, 1998; Comment revised March 10, 2000, effective immediately.

   Committee Explanatory Reports:

   Final Report explaining the March 10, 2000 revision of the Comment deleting ‘‘as amended’’ from the second sentence published with the Court’s Order at 30 Pa.B. 1641 (March 25, 2000).

   The provisions of this Rule 105 amended March 10, 2000, effective immediately, 30 Pa.B. 1639. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (245738) to (245739).