Rule 410. Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea Discussions and Related
Statements.

 (a)  General rule. Except as otherwise provided in this rule, evidence of the following is not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions:

   (1)  a plea of guilty which was later withdrawn;

   (2)  a plea of nolo contendere;

   (3)  any statement made in the course of any proceedings under Rules 409, 414, 424, 311, 313, or 590 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure, Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, or any comparable rule or provision of law of Pennsylvania or any other jurisdiction regarding the pleas identified in subsections (1) and (2) of this rule; or

   (4)  any statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority which does not result in a plea of guilty or which results in a plea of guilty later withdrawn.

 (b)  Exception. A statement made in the course of a plea, proceedings or discussions identified in subsection (a) of this rule is admissible (1) in any proceeding wherein another statement made in the course of the same plea or plea discussions has been introduced by the defendant and the statement ought in fairness to be considered contemporaneously with it, or (2) in a criminal proceeding for perjury, false swearing or unsworn falsification to authorities if the statement was made by the defendant, under oath, and in the presence of counsel.

   This rule is similar to F.R.E. 410. References to Rules 409, 414, 424, 311, 313, and 590 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure and the comparable rules or other provisions of Pennsylvania or other jurisdictions have been added. Unlike the federal rule, subsection (b) of the Pennsylvania rule is set forth separately to indicate that it creates an exception applicable to all of subsection (a).

   Pa.R.E. 410 reflects present Pennsylvania law. See Commonwealth v. Jones, 544 A.2d 54 (1988); Commonwealth ex rel. Warner v. Warner, 40 A.2d 886 (Pa. Super. 1945); Pa.R.Crim.P. 311(B), 313(B).

   Pa.R.E. 410 does not prohibit the use of a conviction that results from a plea of nolo contendere, as distinct from the plea itself, to impeach in a later proceeding (subject to Pa.R.E. 609) or to establish an element of a charge in a later administrative proceeding. See Commonwealth v. Snyder, 182 A.2d 495 (1962) (conviction based on nolo contendere plea could be used to impeach witness in later criminal proceeding); Eisenberg v. Commonwealth, Dep’t. of Public Welfare, 516 A.2d 333 (Pa. 1986) (conviction based on nolo contendere plea permitted to establish element of charge in administrative proceeding).

   In addition, Pa.R.E. 410 does not govern the admissibility of pleas in summary proceedings involving motor vehicle matters, which is addressed in 42 Pa.C.S. §  6142. §  6142 provides:

   §  6142. Pleas in vehicle matters

   (a) General Rule.—A plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or a payment of the fine and costs prescribed after any such plea, in any summary proceeding made by any person charged with a violation of Title 75 (relating to vehicles) shall not be admissible as evidence in any civil matter arising out of the same violation or under the same facts or circumstances.

   (b) Exception.—The provisions of subsection (a) shall not be applicable to administrative or judicial proceedings involving the suspension of a motor vehicle or tractor operating privilege, learner’s permit, or right to apply for a motor vehicle or tractor operating privilege, or the suspension of a certificate of appointment as an official inspection station, or the suspension of a motor vehicle, tractor, or trailer designation.

   Official Note

   Adopted May 8, 1998, effective October 1, 1998; Comment revised March 23, 1999, effective immediately; amended March 10, 2000, effective immediately; amended March 29, 2001, effective April 1, 2001.
Committee Explanatory Reports:

   Final Report explaining the March 23, 1999 technical revisions of the Comment published with the Court’s Order at 29 Pa.B. 1714 (April 3, 1999).

   Final Report explaining the March 10, 2000 technical amendments updating the rule published with the Court’s Order at 30 Pa.B. 1641 (March 25, 2000).

   Final Report explaining the March 29, 2001 amendments published with the Court’s Order at 31 Pa.B. 1995 (April 14, 2001).

   The provisions of this Rule 410 amended March 23, 1999, effective immediately, 29 Pa.B. 1712; amended March 10, 2000, effective immediately, 30 Pa.B. 1639; amended March 29, 2001, effective April 1, 2001, 31 Pa.B. 1993. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (265696) to (265697).