![]()
CHAPTER 1000. APPEALS
APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS WITH RESPECT TO
JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISIONS OF MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT JUDGES IN CIVIL MATTERS
Rule
1001. Definitions.
APPEAL
1002. Time and Method of Appeal.
1003. Bond for Appeal.
1004. Filing Complaint or Praecipe on Appeal. Appeals Involving Cross-Complaints.
1005. Service of Notice of Appeal and Other Papers.
1006. Striking Appeal.
1007. Procedure on Appeal.
1008. Appeal as Supersedeas.
CERTIORARI
1009. Praecipe for Writ of Certiorari.
1010. Bond for Writ of Certiorari.
1011. Issuance and Service of Writ of Certiorari.
1012. Return by Magisterial District Judge.
1013. Writ of Certiorari as Supersedeas.
1014. Orders of Court in Certiorari Proceedings.
1015. Certiorari and Appeal Not Permitted.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTION
1016. Statement of Objection to Rule 420 Orders and Determinations.
1017. Form and Content of Statement of Objection.
1018. Duties of Magisterial District Judge Upon Receipt of Statement of Objection.
1019. Consideration of Statement of Objection by Court of Common Pleas.
1020. Statement of Objection to Operate as Stay.
1081. Acts of Assembly Suspended.
1082. Acts of Assembly Not Suspended.Since these rules are a chapter of the rules of civil procedure governing actions and proceedings before magisterial district judges, the rules in Chapter 200 also apply.
APPELLATE PROCEEDING WITH RESPECT TO
JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISIONS OF MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT JUDGES IN CIVIL MATTERS
Rule 1001. Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
(1) JudgmentA judgment rendered by a magisterial district judge under Rule 319, 322 or 514.
(2) AppealAn appeal from a judgment to the court of common pleas.
(3) CertiorariAn examination by the court of common pleas of the record of proceedings before a magisterial district judge to determine questions raised under Rule 1009A.
(4) SupersedeasA prohibition against any further execution processes on the judgment affected thereby.
(5) Court of common pleasThe court of common pleas of the judicial district in which is located the magisterial district wherein the questioned action of the magisterial district judge took place.
(6) ClaimantIncludes a defendant with respect to a defendants cross-complaint or supplementary action filed pursuant to Rule 342 in the action before the magisterial district judge.
(7) DefendantIncludes a plaintiff with respect to the defendants cross-complaint or supplementary action filed pursuant to Rule 342 in the action before the magisterial district judge.
(8) Service by certified or registered mailThe mailing of properly addressed certified or registered mail.
(9) Proof of serviceA verified written statement that service was made by personal service or by certified or registered mail, with the senders receipt for certified or registered mail attached thereto if service was made by mail.
Official Note
Although one of the purposes of the definitions in this rule is to avoid needless repetition throughout these appellate rules, some of the definitions are intended to state or clarify the law as well.
In connection with the definition of appeal in subdivision (2), see also Rule 1007 and the note thereto.
Under subdivision (3), certiorari is restricted to an examination of the record of the proceedings before the magisterial district judge, which will appear on the complaint forms prescribed by the State Court Administrator. See Flaherty v. Atkins, 189 Pa. Super. 550, 152 A.2d 280 (1959). This is a narrow form of certiorari, both with respect to procedure and the matters which can be considered under Rule 1009A. Since an aggrieved party will be entitled to a broad form of appeal de novo under these rules, there seems to be no justification for providing also for a broad form of certiorari. These restrictions on the writ of certiorari are authorized by § 26 of the Schedule to Article V of the 1968 Constitution. The writ of error, which at common law was probably available only to review the proceedings of a court of record (see Beale v. Dougherty, 3 Binn. 432 (1811)), is not a form of appellate process permitted by these rules. See also County of Carbon v. Leibensperger, 439 Pa. 138, 266 A.2d 632 (1970) (court of common pleas cannot issue writ of prohibition).
The definition of supersedeas in subdivision (4) points out the proper office and limited nature of a supersedeas. See also Rules 1008 and 1013 and the notes thereto.
Under subdivision (9), there is no requirement that the senders receipt for certified mail be postmarked. There is no return receipt requirement for certified or registered mail. It is no longer necessary that the proof of service be under oath or affirmation; however, the statement is now made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Source The provisions of this Rule 1001 amended through December 16, 1983, effective December 1, 1983, 13 Pa.B. 3875; amended April 5, 2002, effective January 1, 2003, 32 Pa.B. 2199. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (212922) and (272497).
APPEAL
Rule 1002. Time and Method of Appeal.
A. A party aggrieved by a judgment for money, or a judgment affecting the delivery of possession of real property arising out of a nonresidential lease, may appeal therefrom within thirty (30) days after the date of the entry of the judgment by filing with the prothonotary of the court of common pleas a notice of appeal on a form which shall be prescribed by the State Court Administrator together with a copy of the Notice of Judgment issued by the magisterial district judge. The Prothonotary shall not accept an appeal from an aggrieved party which is presented for filing more than thirty (30) days after the date of entry of judgment without leave of Court and upon good cause shown.
B. A party aggrieved by a judgment for the delivery of possession of real property arising out of a residential lease may appeal therefrom within ten (10) days after the date of the entry of judgment by filing with the prothonotary of the court of common pleas a notice of appeal on a form which shall be prescribed by the State Court Administrator, together with a copy of the Notice of Judgment issued by the magisterial district judge. The prothonotary shall not accept an appeal from an aggrieved party which is presented for filing more than ten (10) days after the date of entry of judgment without leave of court and upon good cause shown.
Official Note
The thirty day limitation in subdivision A of this rule is the same as that found in the Judicial Code § 5571(b), 42 Pa.C.S. § 5571(b), as amended by § 10(67) of the Judiciary Act Repealer Act, Act of April 28, 1978, P. L. 202, No. 53. The ten day limitation in subdivision B of this rule is designed to implement the time for appeal set forth in § 513 of the Landlord and Tenant Act of 1951 (Act No. 1995-33, approved July 6, 1995) (Act No. 1995-33 was suspended by the Pa. Supreme Court on March 28, 1996 by Order of Court insofar as the Act is inconsistent with Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings Before District Justices, as adopted by that Order.). The two subdivisions of this rule are intended to clarify that where the right of possession of residential real estate is at issue, the shorter, ten day period for appeal applies; where the appeal is taken from any judgment for money, or a judgment affecting a nonresidential lease, under these rules, the thirty day period of time for appeal applies. A party may appeal the money portion of a judgment only within the thirty day appeal period specified in subsection A of this rule. It is the intent of this rule that no supersedeas under Pa.R.C.P.D.J. No. 1008 shall be issued by the Prothonotary after the ten (10) day period for filing an appeal, unless by order of court.
The method of appeal is by filing with the prothonotary a notice of appeal on a form to be prescribed by the State Court Administrator. Copies of this same form will be used for service under Pa.R.C.P.M.D.J. No. 1005. This permits use of the same form for filing and service. No useful purpose would be served by having two forms, one called an appeal for filing and another called a notice of appeal for service.
The 1990 amendment is intended to encourage the complete utilization of the hearing process available before the magisterial district judge.
A copy of the Notice of Judgment must be filed since it will contain the separate entries required by Pa.R.C.P.M.D.J. No. 514.A and will be needed by the Prothonotary.
Source The provisions of this Rule 1002 amended April 25, 1979, effective May 25, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 1499; amended March 27, 1992, effective 90 days from the date on which the Order is signed, 22 Pa.B. 1893 and 1900; amended March 28, 1996, effective March 29, 1996, 26 Pa.B. 1691; amended December 15, 2000, effective January 1, 2001, 30 Pa.B. 6882; corrected July 28, 2006, effective January 1, 2001, 36 Pa.B. 3997. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (309577) to (309578).
Rule 1003. Bond for Appeal.
No bond or other security shall be required for appeal.
Official Note
The provisions of this Rule 1005 amended through October 10, 1980, effective November 10, 1980, 10 Pa.B. 4032; amended March 27, 1992, effective 90 days from the date on which the Order is signed, 22 Pa.B. 1893 and 1900. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (152397) to (152398).
Rule 1006. Striking Appeal.
Upon failure of the appellant to comply with Rule 1004A or Rule 1005B, the prothonotary shall, upon praecipe of the appellee, mark the appeal stricken from the record. The court of common pleas may reinstate the appeal upon good cause shown.
Official Note
This rule is intended to provide sanctions for failing to act within the time limits prescribed.
Source The provisions of this Rule 1008 adopted June 1, 1971; amended April 25, 1979, effective in 30 days; amended June 30, 1982, effective August 16, 1982, 12 Pa.B. 2266; amended March 28, 1996, effective March 29, 1996, 26 Pa.B. 1691; amended May 2, 2008, effective May 15, 2008, 38 Pa.B. 2040. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (309581) to (309582).
CERTIORARI
Rule 1009. Praecipe for Writ of Certiorari.
A. Unless he was the plaintiff in the action before the magisterial district judge, a party aggrieved by a judgment may file with the prothonotary of the court of common pleas a praecipe for a writ of certiorari claiming that the judgment should be set aside because of lack of jurisdiction over the parties or subject matter, improper venue or such gross irregularity of procedure as to make the judgment void. If the party aggrieved by the judgment was the plaintiff in the action before the magisterial district judge, he may file a praecipe for a writ of certiorari only on the last mentioned ground.
B. If lack of jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter is claimed, the praecipe may be filed at any time after judgment. Otherwise it shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of the judgment.
C. The praecipe shall identify the judgment complained of and the magisterial district judge in whose office the record of the proceedings containing the judgment is filed.
D. The praecipe and the writ shall be on a form which shall be prescribed by the State Court Administrator.
Official Note
Subdivision A sets forth the grounds for certiorari. See the comments concerning the limited nature of certiorari in the note to Rule 1001. The plaintiff in the action before the magisterial district judge, and the word plaintiff as used in this rule does not include a defendant who has sued on a cross-complaint, may file a praecipe for a writ of certiorari only on the ground of gross irregularity. Having instituted the proceedings before the magisterial district judge, the plaintiff should not be permitted to challenge jurisdiction or venue.
Under subdivision B, the praecipe for the writ of certiorari must be filed within thirty days after the date of the judgment, except when a question of jurisdiction is raised. There is no time limit on raising a question of jurisdiction by certiorari. Flaherty v. Atkins, 189 Pa. Super. 550, 152 A.2d 280 (1959). A party who files his praecipe after the thirty day period has run can be heard only on the question of jurisdiction (if permitted to raise that question under subdivision A) even though he claims improper venue or gross irregularity along with his claim of lack of jurisdiction.
Source The provisions of this Rule 1009 amended through April 25, 1979, effective May 25, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 1499. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (25119).
Rule 1010. Bond for Writ of Certiorari.
No bond or other security shall be required for issuance of the writ of certiorari.
Official Note
The provisions of this Rule 1011 amended November 21, 1975, 5 Pa.B. 3020. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (21214).
Rule 1012. Return by Magisterial District Judge.
The magisterial district judge to whom the writ of certiorari is directed shall, within ten (10) days after its receipt by him, make return to the writ by transmitting to the prothonotary a certified true copy of the record of the proceedings containing the judgment.
Official Note
The provisions of this Rule 1013 amended through June 30, 1982, effective August 16, 1982, 12 Pa.B. 2266; amended March 28, 1996, effective March 29, 1996, 26 Pa.B. 1691; amended May 2, 2008, effective May 15, 2008, 38 Pa.B. 2040. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (309584) to (309585).
Rule 1014. Orders of Court in Certiorari Proceedings.
A. If the court of common pleas finds in favor of the party obtaining the writ, it shall enter an order that the judgment is set aside without prejudice to the cause of action.
B. If the court of common pleas finds against the party obtaining the writ, it shall enter an order that the writ is dismissed.
Official Note
Subdivision A states the rule that if the court finds in favor of the party obtaining the writ, it merely sets the judgment below aside without prejudice to the cause of action. The grounds for certiorari do not go to the merits of the case but only to matters that usually can be cured by later selecting a proper tribunal. See Statler v. Alexander Film Co., 21 D & C 512 (1934).
Subdivision B provides for dismissal of the writ if the finding is against the party obtaining it. This leaves the judgment below in full force and effect. See Rule 1013C.
Rule 1015. Certiorari and Appeal Not Permitted.
A judgment may not be the subject of both certiorari and appeal. The prothonotary shall mark stricken from the record any writ of certiorari concerning a judgment as to which an appeal is pending if proof of service of copies of the notice of appeal has been filed. If the appeal is stricken or voluntarily terminated, the writ of certiorari shall be reinstated upon praecipe of the party obtaining the writ.
Official Note
This rule forbids bringing both certiorari and an appeal. An appeal involves a trial de novo on the merits, although in many cases first in the form of compulsory arbitration, without regard to any defects in the proceedings below, whereas certiorari does attack defects, not going to the merits, in the proceedings below. To attempt to combine these two procedures would cause administrative difficulties hardly worth the effort, considering that a successful certiorari would often merely allow the case to be tried again, either before another magisterial district judge or in the court of common pleas, and that an appeal actually is a second trial although it may have changed aspects (see Rule 1007B). Probably because of these administrative difficulties, the courts of common pleas have rather uniformly prohibited joining the two remedies of appeal and certiorari and have either required an election or forced the prosecution of the first type filed to the exclusion of the other. See, for example, Ward v. Harligan, 1 W.N.C. 72 (1874); Russell v. Shirk, 3 C.C. 287 (1888). Since under the 1968 Constitution a party is entitled as of right to an appeal (Art. V, § 9) but not to certiorari (Art. V, Schedule, 26), it was decided to provide in this rule that the remedy of appeal would take precedence in all cases and that a writ of certiorari addressed to a judgment under appeal (from the time of filing proof of service) would be stricken. This would apply even in the perhaps rare case when one party appeals and the other files certiorari.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTION
Rule 1016. Statement of Objection to Rule 420 Orders and
Determinations.A. Any party in interest aggrieved by an order or determination made by a magisterial district judge under Rule 420 may obtain a reconsideration thereof in the court of common pleas by filing a statement of objection to the order or determination with the prothonotary and with the magisterial district judge in whose office the order or determination was made.
B. The statement of objection shall be filed with the prothonotary and the magisterial district judge within ten (10) days after the date of the order or determination to which objection is made.
Official Note
This rule and Rules 10171020 provide a system for reconsideration in the court of common pleas of orders and determinations of magisterial district judges dealing with execution matters.
Under subdivision B of this rule, the statement of objection must be filed within ten days after the date of the questioned order or determination. See Rule 421C. The time limit for filing a statement of objection need not be the same as that for filing a notice of appeal from a judgment. See the Judicial Code, § 5571(c)(4), 42 Pa.C.S. § 5571(c)(4), as amended by § 10(67) of the Judiciary Act Repealer Act, Act of April 28, 1978, P. L. 202, No. 53. It may be noted that under Pa. R.C.P. Nos. 3206(b) and 3207(b) objections to sheriffs determinations must be made within ten days after the date of mailing of the determination.
Source The provisions of this Rule 1016 amended April 25, 1979, effective May 25, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 1499. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (21217).
Rule 1017. Form and Content of Statement of Objection.
The statement of objection, which shall be on a form which shall be prescribed by the State Court Administrator, shall merely state that the party filing it objects to the order or determination described in the statement.
Official Note
This rule prescribes the form and content of the statement of objection. Compare Pa. R.C.P. Nos. 3206(b), 3207(b).
Rule 1018. Duties of Magisterial District Judge Upon Receipt of Statement of Objection.
A. Immediately upon receipt of the statement of objection, the magisterial district judge shall send a copy of it by ordinary mail to all other parties in interest.
B. Within ten (10) days after receiving the statement of objection, the magisterial district judge shall file with the prothonotary a certified true copy of the record of actions taken by the magisterial district judge under Rule 420, but copies of only those appeals, objections, claims, exceptions or requests considered under Rule 420 that are pertinent to the statement of objection need be attached to that record.
Official Note
As to the procedure in subdivision A, compare Pa. R.C.P. Nos. 3206(b), 3207(b).
Subdivision B is intended to bring before the court copies of the documents on file in the office of the magisterial district judge pertaining to the matter in question. The attachments to the record of Rule 420 actions referred to in this subdivision are notations by the magisterial district judge of appeals taken under Rule 408C and objections to levy under Rule 413, property claims under Rule 413, exceptions to distribution under Rule 416C and requests to set aside sale under Rule 420C filed in the office of the magisterial district judge.
Rule 1019. Consideration of Statement of Objection by Court of Common Pleas.
A. Upon consideration of the statement of objection, the court of common pleas shall take such action and make such orders as shall be just and proper.
B. The matters raised by the statement of objection shall be considered de novo by the court of common pleas.
Official Note
Consideration of the matters raised by the statement of objection will be de novo and the court is given broad latitude and discretion in disposing of these matters. Although the proceedings are de novo, this will not excuse failure to comply with whatever time limitations are imposed (see Rules 408C, 413, 416C and 420C) for raising before the magisterial district judge the matters now before the court of common pleas.
Rule 1020. Statement of Objection to Operate as Stay.
Until further order of the court of common pleas, receipt by the magisterial district judge of the statement of objection shall operate as a stay of any execution proceedings that may be affected by the proceedings on the statement.
Official Note
Under this rule, receipt by the magisterial district judge of the statement of objection operates initially as an automatic stay of the affected execution proceedings.
Rule 1081. Acts of Assembly Suspended.
All Acts of Assembly or parts thereof inconsistent with the rules governing appellate proceedings with respect to judgments and other decisions of magisterial district judges in civil actions are suspended to the extent of such inconsistency.
The following Acts of Assembly are suspended insofar as they are inconsistent with the foregoing rules:
(1) Act of July 6, 1995, amending the Act of April 6, 1951, (P. L. 69, No. 20), known as Act 33 of 1995;
(2) Act of July 6, 1995, amending the Act of April 6, 1951, (P. L. 69, No. 20), known as Act 36 of 1995.
Adopted June 1, 1971. Amended April 25, 1979, effective in 30 days; June 30, 1982, effective in 30 days after July 17, 1982; March 28, 1996, effective March 29, 1996.
Source The provisions of this Rule 1081 amended through June 30, 1982, effective August 16, 1982, 12 Pa.B. 2266; amended March 28, 1996, effective March 29, 1996, 26 Pa.B. 1691. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (168563) to (168564).
Rule 1082. Acts of Assembly Not Suspended.
The following Acts of Assembly shall not be deemed suspended or affected:
(1) Section 1 of the Act of January 24, 1966, P. L. (1965) 1534, as amended by § 1 of the Act of August 11, 1967, P. L. 204, No. 68 and by § 2 of the Act of June 11, 1968, P. L. 159, No. 89, 35 P. S. § 1700-1.
Official Note
This Section provides, inter alia, that no tenant shall be evicted for any reason while rent is deposited in escrow because the dwelling in question has been certified as unfit for human habitation.
(2) Section 726 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 726.
Official Note
This Section deals with extraordinary jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
(3) Section 5103(a) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5103(a).
Official Note
This Section provides for a transfer of the cause if the appeal is taken to the wrong court.
(4) Section 5571(b), (c)(4) and (f) of the Judicial Code, as amended with respect to subsections (b) and (c)(4) by § 10(67) of the Judiciary Act Repealer Act, Act of April 28, 1978, P. L. No. 53.
Source The provisions of this Rule 1082 amended April 25, 1979, effective May 25, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 1499. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (31616) to (31617).
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.