Pennsylvania Code & Bulletin
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

• No statutes or acts will be found at this website.

The Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code changes effective through 53 Pa.B. 8238 (December 30, 2023).

58 Pa. Code § 163.318. Split samples.

§ 163.318. Split samples.

 (a)  The test sample of the winner of each race and of horses finishing in the money in a race for which there is exotic wagering shall be taken, and a test sample shall be taken from other horses as the Commission or stewards may direct. If there is a problem in securing a test sample, the following procedures apply:

   (1)  A veterinarian may inject up to 1/2 cc. of Lasix to enhance securing a sample upon the written approval of the trainer.

   (2)  If a urine sample is not obtained in 2 hours and either the trainer or the veterinarian elects not to induce the sample by Lasix, a blood sample shall be taken upon the written approval of the trainer.

   (3)  In all cases a urine sample, a urine sample induced by Lasix or a blood sample shall be secured, regardless of delay involved.

 (b)  The urine or blood sample secured under the procedures as set forth in subsection (a), shall be split into two parts. One portion shall be delivered to the Commission’s official chemist for testing. The remaining portion shall be maintained at the detention barn from where it was secured. Both portions shall be stored and shipped at the same range of temperatures and kept and transported in similar fashion.

   (1)  Urine will not be split if less than 50 cc. are obtained. In these instances, either a blood sample shall be taken or the horse detained until an adequate urine sample can be secured. In every event, ‘‘primary’’ and ‘‘split’’ portions of a sample shall always be taken at the same time and shall be of the same substance.

   (2)  Blood samples shall initially be taken in a quantity to insure that ample portions shall be obtained.

 (c)  Upon application by the trainer or owner of the horse in question, the split portion of the sample taken shall be tested by a laboratory designated by the Commission and approved by the Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association.

 (d)  If the test confirms the findings of the original laboratory, it is considered to be a prima facie violation of the applicable provisions of this chapter.

   (1)  If the test of the split portion does not substantially confirm the findings of the original laboratory, the Commission will not consider the sample to constitute a prima facie violation of this chapter and no penalty will be imposed.

   (2)  In order that the split sample be tested, the owners or trainers of the horse in question shall request in writing to the Commission that the split sample be retested. The request shall be received by the Commission within 48 hours after notification of the initial positive test or within a reasonable period of time established by the Commission after consultation with the original laboratory. The reasonable time is to be calculated to insure the integrity of the sample and the preservation of the alleged illegal substance. If the findings of the split sample laboratory substantially confirm the findings of the original laboratory, the owners or trainers requesting the testing of the split sample shall be responsible for the payment of expenses involved in the testing of the split sample. If the findings of the split sample laboratory do not substantially confirm the findings of the original laboratory, the Commission will assume testing costs of the split sample.

   (3)  If the Commission is unable to secure the services of a laboratory to test the split portion of a sample, the Commission will have the option of having the split sample retested at the laboratory which tested the original sample. The owner and trainer affected will be notified by the Commission. If the owner or trainer does not wish to have the split sample retested at the laboratory conducting the original test, the individual may, within 24 hours, attempt to secure the services of a laboratory acceptable to the Commission to conduct the split sample retesting.

   (4)  If the Commission, within 24 hours, is unable to contact the trainer or owner affected by calling him at the telephone number on his latest license application or track location at the track where the sample was taken, the Commission will have the retesting undertaken by the laboratory which tested the original sample.

 (e)  If an Act of God, power failure, accident, strike or other action prevents a retest from being made which is beyond the control of the Commission, the results of the primary official test shall be accepted as prima facie evidence.

 (f)  During the pendency of a proceeding involving a claim that a horse has run with proscribed medication, the stewards shall see that notice of the proceeding is posted in the office of the Secretary at tracks in this Commonwealth where the horse may run or be offered for sale. The obligation shall continue until the horse is sold or transferred or until a final determination of the medication violation is handed down which is not appealed, whichever occurs first.

Source

   The provisions of this §  163.318 amended through January 22, 1982, effective January 23, 1982, 12 Pa.B. 394. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (56257) and (60185).

Notes of Decisions

   Loss of the Split Sample

   The State Horse Racing Commission was entitled to consider the findings of the primary sample to constitute prima facie evidence of a violation sufficient to impose a fine or permanently revoke the race horse trainer’s license even though there was no confirming test results from the split sample, where the split sample was stolen while in the custody and control of the commission’s agent, Airborne Express, and the theft, barring active participation, was an act that was outside the control of the Commission. Monaci v. State Horse Racing Commission, 717 A.2d 612 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998).

   The action of throwing away and thus destroying a split sample by employes of the Commission after the samples had been covered with soot by a fire was tantamount to a denial of administrative due process. Delaney v. State Horse Racing Commission, 535 A.2d 719 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1988).

   Prima Facie Violation

   Verification of a positive horse blood or urine sample by an independent laboratory shall establish a prima facie violation of these regulations. Worthington v. Horse Racing Commission, 514 A.2d 311 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986).

   Split Samples

   Test samples of blood or urine must be obtained from every horse winning a race, and from all horses finishing ‘‘in the money’’ in a race for which there is exotic wagering. The samples shall be split in two parts, one of which is to be delivered to the Commission’s official chemist for testing, with the remaining portion of the sample held at the detention barn for independent testing if required. Worthington v. Horse Racing Commission, 514 A.2d 311 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986).

Cross References

   This section cited in 58 Pa. Code §  163.302 (relating to foreign drugs, medications or substances); and 58 Pa. Code §  163.308 (relating to official laboratory).



No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.


This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.