Rule 302. Procedures for Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition in Summary Cases in the Court of Common PleasLocal Option.
(A) When the district attorney has filed a certification to proceed by local option under Rule 300, after institution of criminal proceedings in a summary case, the issuing authority, the defendant, the defendants attorney, or any other interested person may request that the district attorney consider the defendants case for inclusion in the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition Program.
(B) If the district attorney decides to move for the defendants inclusion in an ARD program, the case shall proceed as provided in Rules 311320, subject to the local procedures formulated by the president judge pursuant to Rule 300(D).
(C) If the district attorney decides not to move for the defendants inclusion in an ARD program, or if the defendant declines to accept or fails to complete the program, or if the judge does not accept the case for ARD, the case shall be referred to the proper issuing authority and shall proceed as provided in Chapter 4.
This rule provides the general procedures for ARD in a summary case that has been removed to the court of common pleas by the filing of a certification by the district attorney pursuant to Rule 300(B)(1). Working within the procedural framework of this rule, the president judge has the responsibility of establishing for the judicial district the specific local procedures which will govern ARD in summary cases in the court of common pleas as required in Rule 300(D).
Unless provided otherwise in the local procedures formulated by the president judge, when the district attorney decides to move for the defendants inclusion in an ARD program pursuant to paragraph (B), the issuing authority must be notified of that decision. Thereafter, the issuing authority should immediately file the transcript of any proceedings, the original complaint or citation, the summons or warrant of arrest, if any, and the bail bond, if any, with the officer of the court of common pleas designated to receive such papers.
As used in paragraph (A), any other interested person would include, for example, the parent of a juvenile charged with a summary offense, the law enforcement officer who instituted the proceedings, or a representative from the community service program or the probation department.
Rule 162 adopted January 31, 1991, effective July 1, 1991; renumbered Rule 302 and amended March 1, 2000, effective April 1, 2001.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
Report explaining the January 31, 1991 amendments published at 20 Pa.B. 4788 (September 15, 1990); Supplemental Report published at 21 Pa.B. 621 (February 16, 1991).
Final Report explaining the March 1, 2000 reorganization and renumbering of the rules published with the Courts Order at 30 Pa.B. 1477 (March 18, 2000).
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.