Rule 578. Omnibus Pretrial Motion for Relief.
Unless otherwise required in the interests of justice, all pretrial requests for relief shall be included in one omnibus motion.
Types of relief appropriate for the omnibus pretrial motions include the following requests:
(1) for continuance;
(2) for severance and joinder or consolidation;
(3) for suppression of evidence;
(4) for psychiatric examination;
(5) to quash or dismiss an information;
(6) for change of venue or venire;
(7) to disqualify a judge;
(8) for appointment of investigator;
(9) for pretrial conference;
(10) challenging the array of an indicting grand jury;
(11) for transfer from criminal proceedings to juvenile proceedings pursuant to 42 Pa.C..S. § 6322; and
(12) proposing or opposing the admissibility of scientific or expert evidence.
The omnibus pretrial motion rule is not intended to limit other types of motions, oral or written, made pretrial or during trial, including those traditionally called motions in limine, which may affect the admissibility of evidence or the resolution of other matters. The earliest feasible submissions and rulings on such motions are encouraged.
See Pa.R.E. 702 and 703 regarding the admissibility of scientific or expert testimony. Pa.R.E. 702 codifies Pennsylvanias adherence to the test to determine the admissibility of expert evidence first established in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923) and adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Topa, 369 A.2d 1277 (Pa. 1977). Given the potential complexity when the admissibility of such evidence is challenged, such challenges should be raised in advance of trial as part of the omnibus pretrial motion if possible. However, nothing in this rule precludes such challenges from being raised in a motion in limine when circumstances necessitate it.
All motions filed pursuant to this rule are public records. However, in addition to restrictions placed by law and rule on the disclosure of confidential information, the motions are subject to the Case Records Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania and may require further precautions, such as placing certain types of information in a Confidential Information Form or providing both a redacted and unredacted version of the filing. See Rule 113.1.
See Rule 113.1 regarding the Case Records Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania and the requirements regarding filings and documents that contain confidential information.
See Rule 556.4 for challenges to the array of an indicting grand jury and for motions to dismiss an information filed after a grand jury indicts a defendant.
Formerly Rule 304, adopted June 30, 1964, effective January 1, 1965; amended and renumbered Rule 306 June 29, 1977 and November 22, 1977, effective as to cases in which the indictment or information is filed on or after January 1, 1978; amended October 21, 1983, effective January 1, 1984; Comment revised October 25, 1990, effective January 1, 1991; Comment revised August 12, 1993, effective September 1, 1993; renumbered Rule 578 and Comment revised March 1, 2000, effective April 1, 2001; Comment revised June 21, 2012, effective in 180 days; Comment revised July 31, 2012, effective November 1, 2012; Comment revised September 21, 2017, effective January 1, 2018; Comment revised January 5, 2018, effective January 6, 2018; Comment revised June 1, 2018, effective July 1, 2018.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
Report explaining the October 25, 1990 Rule 306 Comment revision published at 20 Pa.B. 1696 (March 24, 1990).
Report explaining the August 12, 1993 Comment revision published at 22 Pa.B. 3826 (July 25, 1992).
Final Report explaining the March 1, 2000 reorganization and renumbering of the rules published with the Courts Order at 30 Pa.B. 1478 (March 18, 2000).
Final Report explaining the June 21, 2012, revision of the Comment referencing indicting grand jury rules published with the Courts Order at 42 Pa.B. 4153 (July 7, 2012).
Final Report explaining the July 31, 2012 Comment revision adding motions for transfer published with the Courts Order at 42 Pa.B. 5340 (August 18, 2012).
Final Report explaining the September 21, 2017 Comment revision regarding pretrial challenges to the admissibility of expert evidence published with the Courts Order at 47 Pa.B. 6173 (October 7, 2017).
Final Report explaining the January 5, 2018 Comment revisions regarding the Courts public access policy published with the Courts Order at 48 Pa.B. 490 (January 20, 2018).
Comment revisions regarding the Courts public access policy published with the Courts Order at 48 Pa.B. 3575 (June 16, 2018).
The provisions of this Rule 578 adopted June 21, 2012, effective in 180 days, 42 Pa.B. 4140; amended July 31, 2012, effective November 1, 2012, 42 Pa.B. 5333; amended September 21, 2017, effective January 1, 2018, 47 Pa.B. 6173; amended January 5, 2018, effective January 6, 2018, 48 Pa.B. 487; amended June 1, 2018, effective July 1, 2018, 48 Pa.B. 3575. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (390261) to (390262).
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.